Alleging ‘breach of trust’, Sajad Lone resigns from Gupkar Alliance

KT NEWS SERVICE. Dated: 1/21/2021 12:04:50 AM

SRINAGAR, Jan 19: Sajad Lone of the People’s Conference on Tuesday parted ways with the People’s Alliance for Gupkar Declaration, an alliance of mainstream regional parties in Jammu and Kashmir, opposed to the Centre’s August 2019 changes in the region. Lone was the official spokesperson of the Gupkar Alliance.
Lone announced the decision in a letter to the coalition, addressed to the PAGD president, Dr Farooq Abdullah, in which he accused the alliance parties, which includes National Conference and People’s Democratic Party, of fielding proxy candidates despite a common minimum program devised for the recently held District Development Council elections.
A tie-up of six parties, the Gupkar Alliance was formed in October with the objective of reinstating the special status of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution, which was de-operationalised by the Narendra Modi government on August 5.
“This alliance needed sacrifice,” he said in his letter. “Every party had to sacrifice on the ground in terms of giving space to fellow allies. No party is willing to cede space, no party is willing to sacrifice. We fought against each other in Kashmir province not against the perpetrators of August 5. And those who perpetrated August 5 and their minions are now vocally gleeful.”
“On the face of it, PAGD (People’s Alliance for Gupkar Declaration) won these elections unambiguously having won the maximum number of seats,” Lone said. But “the votes polled against the PAGD are majorly the votes cast by proxies of PAGD constituent parties against official PAGD candidates. And the net outcome of selectively voting for and against PAGD is a very poor vote share.”
Lone said that it was difficult for his party to stay on and pretend as if nothing has happened. This was not the vote share the people of Jammu and Kashmir deserved after the revocation of Article 370, he added.
“There has been a breach of trust between partners which we believe is beyond remedy,” the People’s Conference leader wrote. “The majoritarian view in our party is the we should pull out of the alliance in an amicable manner rather than waiting for things to get messier. And I am confirming that we will no longer be a part of the PAGD alliance.”
He further said that he would, however, continue to fight for the alliance’s objectives. “We will continue to adhere to the objectives that we set out when this alliance was made,” Lone’s letter read. “And the PAGD leadership should be assured that we will extend support on all issues which fall within the ambit of stated objectives. We have issued clear instructions to all party leaders not to issue any statements against PAGD alliance or its leaders.”
The full text of Sajad Lone’s letter:
“I am writing to you in reference to the recently held DDC elections and a spate of statements issued by leaders belonging to our party. The recurring theme of the statements was the fielding of proxy candidates by constituent parties against the officially mandated candidates of the PAGD.
We convened a meeting of our leaders yesterday and deliberated on the issue in detail. The predominant feeling in the meeting was that the PAGD sentiment at top was not emulated on the ground. It was felt that the results of a sincere alliance should have meant that “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”. Instead, “the whole was not greater than the sum of parts, sadly not even equalto the sum of parts, but much lesser and equal to just one part of the many parts.” If you remove the inverted commas, the sad reality that emerges is that in majority of the places the party fielding the candidate on behalf of PAGD was left to fend for itself and secured the votes that his party managed. In most places other parties were silent bystanders or worst compounded the problem by fielding proxy candidates.
DDC elections per se may not matter institutionally. But these elections were distinctive by virtue of the timing. Firstly, the context of these DDC elections was politically very important. It was the first election post 5 August . And secondly it was a combined show of strength of a majority of the J-K political mainstream. It was less of an election more of an opportunity to send a strong unanimous political message.
On the face of it, PAGD won these elections unambiguously having won the maximum number of seats. We can’t hide statistics and apart from the number of seats that PAGD won, other important statistical variable in the context of 5 August is the number of votes polled against the PAGD. We believe that the votes polled against the PAGD are majorly the votes cast by proxies of PAGD constituent parties against official PAGD candidates. And the net outcome of selectively voting for and against PAGD is a very poor vote share. This is certainly not the vote share that people of J and K deserved post5 August.
Out here in Srinagar where we hold our apex body meetings, we look at the statistics but out there on the ground people look at our actions and our intentions. They are eye witnesses to our actions. They are the actors in the political theatre scripted by us. And we think that people don’t know what we were up to. People know that blinded by political greed we fielded candidates against each other and the question they are asking, “if we can’t trust the PAGD leadership on something as basic as a DDC seat how can we trust them for larger issues.” We might have inflicted irreversible damage on to ourselves and on to the very people that we are supposed to represent. Trust between allying partners who have been rivals all along can be very elusive and extremely fragile. proxies have made it perpetually elusive. This alliance needed sacrifice. Every party had to sacrifice on the ground in terms of giving space to fellow allies. No party is willing to cede space, no party is willing to sacrifice. We fought against each other in Kashmir province not against the perpetrators of 5 August. And those who perpetrated 5 August and their minions are now vocally gleeful.
It is difficult for us to stay on and pretend as if nothing has happened. There has been a breach of trust between partners which we believe is beyond remedy. The majoritarian view in our party is the we should pull out of the alliance in an amicable manner rather than waiting for things to get messier. And I am confirming that we will no longer be a part of the PAGD alliance.
I would however want to add that we are divorcing from the alliance not its objectives. We will continue to adhere to the objectives that we set out when this alliance was made. And the PAGD leadership should be assured that we will extend support on all issues which fall within the ambit of stated objectives. We have issued clear instructions to all party leaders not to issue any statements against PAGD alliance or its leaders.
May I take this opportunity to thank all the members. It has been a memorable experience. And my special thanks to doctor sahib.”

 

Video

Indian History... Read More
 

FACEBOOK

 

Daily horoscope

 

Weather