A Legacy of Contradictions: Unravelling an Enigma Called Sheikh Abdullah
Book: Sheikh Abdullah: The Caged Lion of Kashmir
Author: Chitralekha Zutshi
Publisher, Yale University Press, 2024
Indian Imprint, HarperCollins IN, 2024
Noor Ahmad Baba[*]
“Sheikh Abdullah: The Caged Lion of Kashmir” by Chitralekha Zutshi is the second book in the Indian Lives series, edited and curated by Ramachandra Guha. The biography offers a comprehensive exploration and a nuanced examination of Sheikh Abdullah’s life and legacy set against the backdrop of Kashmir’s tumultuous history in the 20th century.
The study vividly portrays his successes and failures in navigating the complex forces, particularly during about three decades in the middle of the 20th century, a period that witnessed significant reshaping of the subcontinent’s history. These challenges often hindered the success of his political vision for his people and the region, diluting its impact.
Chitralekha Zutshi, as a professionally qualified historian with extensive knowledge of Kashmir’s history, adds a layer of authenticity and depth to her portrayal of Sheikh Abdullah. Having previously written on various aspects of Kashmir’s history, Zutshi brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to her examination of Sheikh Abdullah’s life and times.
In the process of writing the biography, she has been able to tap into some vital private collections. Some of these have been opened to public scrutiny for the first time. These particularly throw significant information and insights on a period that has been important from the point of view of Kashmir’s post-partition complexly interwoven history and its legacy as a festering problem internally and in relation to the larger subcontinent.
Along with Sheikh’s central role, Zutshi has discussed a number of other political figures and forces from within and outside Kashmir that helped or hampered the Sheikh’s politics in relation to Kashmir and its future. In doing so, her biography largely covers Kashmir’s complex history through the large part of the twentieth century.
It begins by detailing the humbler background from which Sheikh came and grew as part of a community that suffered several social and political disadvantages and deprivations within the evolving emancipatory environment in South Asia.
It is within this broader context that Zutshi’s biography explores and analyses Sheikh Abdullah’s multifaceted persona, portraying him as a Kashmiri nationalist deeply committed to preserving the region’s identity and empowering its people. She delves into his role as a committed Muslim, who by conviction believed in the principles of secularism and non-violence as means to achieve political objectives.
Through meticulous research and analysis, Zutshi paints a vivid picture of Sheikh Abdullah’s efforts to uplift Kashmir socially, economically, and politically, highlighting his vision for the region with a degree of empathy for the complexity he had to navigate during his political career.
Despite his significant contributions, Sheikh Abdullah faced numerous challenges and failures throughout his career. Zutshi indicates, often very subtly, the inadequacies of his comprehension of the complex social, political, and historical forces at play, as well as his inflated ego, which undermined his ability to form lasting political alliances (or even retain working relationships) and account for larger historical processes while charting out his course of action and strategy for meeting his objectives in politics.
She also discusses how the partition of the subcontinent impacted Kashmir, undermining Sheikh Abdullah’s vision for its future and presenting challenges that were beyond his control and capacity to deal with.
His most trying moments came while negotiating for a reasonably autonomous status for Jammu and Kashmir within the Constitution of India at a time when dominant forces nationally were engineering a more centralised framework for the Union of India.
His failure to deal with the internal contradictions within the state, combined with the mobilization of communal and assimilationist forces at a larger level against the status he had secured for the state under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, frustrated him to the extent that he began to lose control of the situation internally and in relation to the government at the centre.
The chain of events that followed culminated in the unceremonious dismissal of his government on August 9, 1953, his arrest and as some would say led to his political wilderness due to forces and factors that were beyond his control.
This in the long run facilitated further undoing of much of whatever he had or could have achieved for the state and its people. His retreat in the early 1970s, when his age and evolving regional context had left very little with him to bargain with from a position of strength, further undermined a substantial part of his legacy, overshadowing many of his significant achievements for his people and the region.
The biography comes at a critical juncture when Sheikh Abdullah’s legacy and contributions are being questioned, downplayed, and even systematically undermined by powerful forces at work in recent years.
By presenting a balanced and objective account of Sheikh Abdullah’s life and contributions, Zutshi’s work to some degree contributes to intellectually reaffirming his importance to Kashmir’s history despite his failures.
In sum, “Sheikh Abdullah: The Caged Lion of Kashmir” is a seminal work that provides a comprehensive and insightful look into the life of one of Kashmir’s most influential figures.
Chitralekha Zutshi’s meticulous research, coupled with her nuanced analysis, offers readers a deeper understanding of Sheikh Abdullah’s role in shaping the political landscape of Kashmir and his enduring but somewhat contentious legacy in the region.
The book features a rich collection of meticulously formulated endnotes and references, enhancing its value for scholars and serious students of Kashmir studies. However, in one instance in the notes of chapter one, there appears to be a mix-up between the population figures of the Indian side of divided Jammu and Kashmir and those of the former princely state.[†] Hopefully, any such error that might have inadvertently crept into the book will be addressed in the revised edition.
[†] Note 3. P. 270.
*Professor Noor Ahmad Baba is a political scientist, and Former Dean, School of Social Sciences Kashmir & Central University of Kashmir
—–
Have you liked the news article?