The recent militant attack in Balochistan, attributed to the Baloch Liberation Front (BLF), which reportedly killed 18 civilians, 15 Pakistani soldiers and scores of its own members, serves as a stark and violent reminder of a festering conflict.
It is a stunning display of defiance, a brutal interruption in the uneasy calm imposed by state force. Yet, to interpret such actions as harbingers of imminent political change is to misread the fundamental power dynamics at play.
While these strikes expose the nerves of the Pakistani state, they do not, and likely cannot, alter the ground reality of entrenched military control over the restive province. The path for the Baloch people remains agonizingly fraught, caught between the iron fist of the state, the pitfalls of their own divisions, and the seductive but dangerous chimeras of geopolitical fortune.
The sheer scale of the Pakistani military’s presence and its counter-insurgency strategy in Balochistan renders the notion of a militant-led victory fantastical. The state’s apparatus is designed to absorb such blows, retaliate with overwhelming force, and tighten its grip.
Human Cost of the War
The true tragedy, however, lies not in the military stalemate but in the horrific human cost paid to maintain it. For over two decades, Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies have been accused of committing gross human rights violations on a massive scale.
The practice of enforced disappearances is a national wound, with Balochistan as its epicenter. Hundreds, potentially thousands, of mainly educated Baloch youth —students, lawyers, activists — have been illegally detained, tortured, and killed, their families left in agonising limbo.
This repression has evolved in chilling ways. A particularly sinister trend is the increasing arrest and alleged torture of Baloch women, young and old, suspected of supporting or participating in the armed struggle.
Historically, Baloch society has been deeply conservative, with women’s public roles circumscribed. Their visible entry into the political and now the militant fray is both a testament to the desperation caused by state brutality and a potent symbolic challenge.
While still a fringe activity, it signals a dangerous erosion of social barriers. The state’s targeting of women is not just a tactical move; it is an inflammatory act that risks incensing the entire social fabric, reinforcing the narrative of the conflict as a genocidal campaign by a “Punjabi”-dominated military against the Baloch nation.
This perception is further cemented by the systematic profiling and arbitrary arrest of Baloch students across universities in Punjab and Sindh, transforming educational institutions into sites of fear and alienation.
Political and Economic Crisis
Politically, Balochistan is trapped in a void. The province’s ruling elite, often dismissed as factotums of the military establishment, wield ceremonial power at best. Real authority rests with the military’s opaque command structure, currently led by General Asim Munir, whose regime operates with an iron stranglehold on national policy, a term that is increasingly seen as a convenient alibi to sanctify and hide the crimes and corruption of the military.
With meaningful political activity suffocated and credible judicial or parliamentary mechanisms for redress utterly discredited, the state has forfeited its legitimacy in the eyes of most of the Baloch population. This has widened support for pro-freedom insurgents.
As Pakistan’s economic crisis deepens, plunging millions into poverty, Balochistan retreats further into a black hole of chaos, mismanagement, and despair, despite its immense mineral wealth, its resources extracted while its people are dispossessed.
Inherent Contradictions in Balochistan
In this bleak landscape, some within the resistance gaze outward, pinning hopes on distant geopolitical earthquakes. The speculative notion that a US-led balkanization of Iran could create a domino effect, destabilising Pakistan and opening a window for a Baloch state, is a dangerous fantasy.
Even if such a remote possibility materialised, history offers a grim lesson: stateless nations emerging from the ruins of empire or regional collapse seldom find true sovereignty. They often exchange one master for another, becoming pawns in a new great game, their resources and strategic location exploited by foreign powers.
The likely result would not be liberation but a new form of subjugation, potentially more chaotic, violent and internationally contested.
The Baloch struggle is further complicated by profound internal and external divisions. Internally, internecine rivalries between various militant groups and tribal leaders have chronically dogged them and are the main reason for the failure to form a unified front.
Externally, the Baloch population is bifurcated between Pakistan and Iran, with smaller communities in Afghanistan. This transnational dispersion has more often been a source of strategic divergence, as groups in different countries navigate distinct state repressions and geopolitical alliances.
A coherent, pan-Baloch political vision remains elusive.
Given the immensity of the state’s military power, the perils of militant exhaustion, and the mirage of geopolitical salvation, what alternative path exists?
Towards Peaceful, Disciplined Resistance
The argument for a strategic pivot is immense in its difficulty but imperative in its logic. It involves the painstaking, unglamorous work of forging a strong, cohesive political and civil society movement.
This movement must first seek to bridge the divides within Baloch society itself. Then, it must attempt the herculean task of building alliances with independent democratic forces within Pakistan - in Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and among Punjabi progressives - who also battle the military’s hegemony.
Furthermore, it must cultivate solidarity with the Baloch in Iran and Afghanistan, and crucially, with the international human rights community and diaspora. The goal must be to transform the Baloch cause from being seen primarily as a security problem to being recognised universally as a profound political and human rights crisis.
A disciplined, peaceful civil resistance movement, though fraught with risk and offering no guarantee of safety, presents a far greater moral and strategic challenge to the state than sporadic militancy. It denies the military the pretext for indiscriminate retaliation and amplifies the voices of the oppressed on a global stage where Pakistan is increasingly sensitive to its image.
The latest BLF action is a scream of rage against a crushing status quo. But screams, however justified, are not strategies. The Pakistani military’s fortress is currently too strong to be stormed by guerrilla actions alone.
The dream of a sovereign Balochistan, if it is to be anything more than a recurring tragedy or a geopolitical illusion, must navigate the narrow, treacherous path between the reality of state repression and the necessity of political imagination.
It requires turning a struggle defined by death and disappearance into one that can galvanize life, unity, and unwavering political will. In the face of seemingly insurmountable odds, that is the only road that leads not just to resistance, but potentially, to redemption.
Have you liked the news article?