When I heard that Khurram Parvez and Irfan Mehraj had finally been granted bail, I did not celebrate. I simply exhaled, a long, weary breath that many Kashmiris have been holding for years. Then I read the conditions attached to their release, and that breath caught in my throat once again.
What the courts have offered these two men is not freedom. It is a transfer from a small prison in Rohini to a much larger prison whose walls are invisible, built from legal conditions, distance, financial burdens and enforced silence.
Khurram Parvez spent 1,703 days behind bars without trial. Irfan Mehraj spent 1,219 days in detention. These are not merely statistics. They represent years taken from families, children who grew up without their fathers, ageing parents who waited endlessly for their sons, and lives suspended by an endless legal process.
In June 2023, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention declared Khurram's detention arbitrary and called for his immediate and unconditional release. India chose to ignore that opinion. Now, after years of incarceration, the prison gate has finally opened, only to usher him into another form of confinement.
The conditions imposed by the Delhi High Court reveal the nature of this so-called liberty. Khurram must furnish a bond of Rs 600,000, reside in Delhi nearly 900 kilometres away from his home in Srinagar, surrender his passport, regularly report to authorities and refrain from making public statements. Thirteen conditions accompany his release.
For someone whose family, work, community and life's purpose are rooted in Kashmir, compulsory residence in Delhi is not simply a legal condition. It amounts to exile within his own country.
How is a human rights defender expected to rebuild his life in one of India's most expensive cities while continuing to support his family back home? Who pays the rent in Delhi while maintaining a household in Srinagar? The court has not merely granted bail. It has imposed an economic burden that many would struggle to meet.
Yet the most troubling restriction is the prohibition on public statements.
For more than two decades, Khurram Parvez has documented enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings and unmarked graves through the Jammu Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society. His life's work has been to amplify voices that otherwise would never be heard.
To tell such a man that he may leave prison only if he remains silent strikes at the very core of his identity. A documentarian forbidden to document. A witness prohibited from speaking. A defender of rights compelled to abandon public advocacy.
Bail Condition: Continued Punishment
This is not merely a bail condition. It is the continuation of punishment through different means.
Journalist Irfan Mehraj confronts the same architecture of control. Like Khurram, he has been accused of funding terrorist activities and promoting a secessionist agenda, charges brought under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, legislation that has increasingly become the instrument through which journalists, researchers and human rights defenders in Kashmir are prosecuted.
Under the UAPA, the process itself often becomes the punishment. Trials move at a painfully slow pace. Bail is exceptionally difficult to secure. Years pass before guilt or innocence is determined, while the accused endure prolonged incarceration, financial ruin, reputational damage and profound psychological distress.
By the time bail is eventually granted, much of the punishment has already been inflicted.
This pattern has steadily narrowed Kashmir's civic space. Lawyers, journalists, researchers and activists who document human rights concerns increasingly find themselves subjected to investigation, surveillance or prosecution.
The contradiction surrounding Khurram Parvez is particularly striking. In 2023, he received the prestigious Martin Ennals Award, one of the world's highest honours for human rights defenders. Internationally, his work was recognised as courageous and exemplary. At home, the same work has been treated as evidence of criminality.
The very documentation that earned him global respect has been portrayed by investigators as terrorism.
International human rights organisations, including the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, jointly supported by the International Federation for Human Rights (IFDH) and the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), have rightly described these proceedings as judicial harassment intended to discredit legitimate human rights work. Their demand is straightforward: the charges should be dropped, and the prosecutions brought to an end.
They are right. Bail is not justice.
Justice would mean acquittal after a fair process. It would mean restoring passports, removing restrictions on speech, allowing these men to return home to Srinagar without conditions, and acknowledging the years unjustly taken from their lives. Justice would also require meaningful reparations for the irreparable damage already done.
For Kashmiris, however, this experience is painfully familiar.
Generations have lived under curfews, checkpoints, communication blackouts and restrictions on movement. The conditions imposed upon Khurram simply replicate that larger reality in miniature. You may move, but only where permitted. You may live, but not where you belong. You may breathe, but not speak.
It is freedom carefully redesigned by the jailer.
Khurram Parvez and Irfan Mehraj will almost certainly endure these conditions with the same dignity they displayed throughout their years in prison. Their families and legal teams now struggle to satisfy conditions that appear deliberately difficult, if not impossible, to fulfill. That struggle itself forms part of the punishment.
My appeal to the Indian authorities is simple.
Drop the charges. End this prolonged legal ordeal. A nation that prides itself on being the world's largest democracy should not fear the testimony of its own citizens, nor seek to silence those who peacefully document human rights concerns.
A prison built of concrete may confine the body. A prison built of legal restrictions may attempt to silence the mind. But neither has ever succeeded in imprisoning the truth.
Khurram and Irfan's freedom remains incomplete. Their courage, however, has never been diminished.
Have you liked the news article?