The political temperature in Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir (PaJK), officially named ‘Azad Jammu Kashmir’ appears to be rising once again. The call by the Joint Awami Action Committee for a shutdown and long march on June 9, if the agreement signed with the government on October 4, 2025, is not implemented by May 31, 2026, has pushed the situation to a critical juncture. Unclear government strategy, delays, and growing questions surrounding the upcoming elections have further intensified the atmosphere.
Ground realities and recent public sentiment suggest that the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC) is not in a position to withdraw its call without the implementation of its demands. Past experience also shows that movements of this nature do not end on unfulfilled promises. As a result, the region once again appears to be standing on the brink of a sensitive political test.
Weakness or Strategy?
The perceived delay and lack of seriousness on the part of the PaJK government in implementing the agreement have raised several questions. Is this merely administrative weakness, or is there a broader political strategy at play? Some observers suggest that the situation may be allowed to deteriorate to a point where postponing elections becomes justifiable, though there is no official confirmation of this.
On the other hand, informal sources indicate that within sections of the police, the demands of the Action Committee are viewed as public and legitimate. If this perception is accurate, it highlights a clear gap between the state narrative and public sentiment -something that can prove decisive in any political crisis.
Concerns are also growing regarding the possible direction of the long march. Reports suggest that this time the march may head towards the Legislative Assembly, and participants may not be willing to stop at any stage. This raises an important question: will the government allow the march to proceed peacefully, or attempt to stop it, and what consequences might follow?
A further complicating factor is the reported possibility of additional security forces being called in from Pakistan. If this happens, it will be important to assess whether political actors at the Pakistan level support such a strategy, and whether it will ease tensions or further inflame them. It will also raise questions about the role of those institutions that some consider to be guarantors of the agreement.
Initial signs of public response point towards a potentially larger level of participation this time. Traditional narratives against the Action Committee appear to have had limited impact, suggesting an increase in its public support.
The Pragmatic Course
In such a situation, the most prudent course for the government would be to immediately present transparent details of progress on the agreement and ensure implementation of the agreed-upon points. Timely and sincere action will not only prevent confrontation but also lay the foundation for political stability in the region.
Similarly, the Government of Pakistan and relevant institutions need to ensure a transparent, fair, and peaceful electoral process in PaJK, in order to strengthen trust and stability. Any attempt to weaken or suppress the Action Committee may lead to unpredictable outcomes and could ultimately undermine the very political objectives it seeks to achieve.
At present, the key question remains: will the matter be resolved through dialogue, or is PaJK once again heading towards decisions being made on the streets?
Given that PaJK is, in practical terms, administered by Pakistan, and that the previous agreement was reached in the presence and with the guarantee of representatives of the Government of Pakistan, it is imperative that the Government of Pakistan and its relevant institutions immediately ensure that the current PaJK government implements all agreed demands.
Understanding the Signals
According to emerging information, despite efforts by ruling circles in PaJK, including state-aligned media, to shape a narrative against the Action Committee, the majority of the public holds both the PaJK government and the Government of Pakistan responsible for the non-implementation of the agreement.
With 27 days remaining until the Action Committee’s final deadline of May 31, there is still time. The demands should be implemented in good faith and with full transparency, and the matter must not be turned into an issue of ego.
Otherwise, the scale of public participation and enthusiasm witnessed in the Action Committee’s recent conferences on the right to governance and ownership clearly indicate that it currently holds the real political momentum in PaJK. Public mobilisation suggests that people are prepared to go to significant lengths in response to the Committee’s call.
Have you liked the news article?