The new weapon in socio-political warfare on social media. Image is representational. Photo/AI Generated ChatGPT
Comment Articles

The New Weapon in Socio-Political Warfare

Social Face Disfigurement now drives politics, journalism, and activism, underscoring the need for stronger laws, media literacy, and more responsible citizens

Farooq Ahmad Bakloo

In September 2020, actor Rhea Chakraborty became one of the most hated women in India, almost overnight. After her boyfriend, actor Sushant Singh Rajput, died by suicide, television anchors and social media users branded her a gold digger and accused her of performing black magic on him. She was arrested and jailed for weeks in a related drugs case. Five years later, in March 2025, the CBI closed its investigation and cleared her and her family of any role in his death.

The clean chit made headlines for a day. The character assassination had run for years.

This is what can be called Social Face Disfigurement: a deliberate, sustained attempt to destroy a person's public credibility through narratives, misinformation and selective framing. Reputation, built over years through trust and conduct, can now be dismantled in hours. And once damaged, it rarely recovers at the same speed or scale.

Modern politics increasingly works this way. Political actors no longer compete only over policy; they compete over what people believe. The fight for power has become a fight over perception, and reputation has become one of its main battlegrounds.

Rampant Abuse

The pattern is almost universal. Ladakh's Sonam Wangchuk’s environmental campaigns were turned into a debate about his own credibility instead of his arguments. Journalists who expose corruption are routinely met with attacks on their motives instead of making the powerful accountable. Human-rights defenders, anti-corruption activists, environmental campaigners, and social reformers similarly experience reputational damage. Students who question their institutions over falling standards or poor accountability get branded as troublemakers.

These are attempts to silence important questions by discrediting the questioner.

The social face disfigurement profusely flows on certain occasions. Election campaigns increasingly run on edited clips and coordinated messaging designed to fix an impression that is not anchored in facts. Minority communities are blamed collectively for a country's problems, a pattern visible in India and in other democracies, including the United States. During COVID-19, even scientists and doctors were not spared. Debates over vaccines and lockdowns often turned into contests over who could be trusted, rather than what the evidence showed.

Digital platforms make it worse. Algorithms reward outrage, so false and exaggerated claims travel faster than the corrections that follow, if corrections come at all. That gap between accusation and clearance is where the real damage happens. Rhea Chakraborty lived in that gap for five years.

None of this means public figures should be shielded from scrutiny. Journalists, activists and politicians must answer for their actions. But there is a difference between accountability and character assassination, between evidence-based criticism and a coordinated effort to make someone's name toxic before the facts are known.

How to Fix It

Fixing this needs effort on several fronts. We need stronger laws against defamation, deepfakes and coordinated harassment, without weakening free speech. We need more transparency from platforms around manipulation and bot networks. We need media literacy taught early in schools. We also need political parties that compete on issues instead of destroying opponents' names and journalists who verify before they publish.

In a nutshell, we need citizens who pause before sharing anything that could ruin someone's name. The ethical responsibility lies on everyone’s shoulders. Democracies flourish when disagreement is resolved through constitutional values, transparency, accountability, and reasoned dialogue rather than systematic character assassination. Historical experience across the world shows that societies which normalise reputational destruction eventually weaken public trust in institutions themselves.

Behind every trending hashtag is a real person. A democracy isn't measured by how fast it can destroy a reputation. It is measured by how sincerely it protects truth and human dignity.

Have you liked the news article?

SUPPORT US & BECOME A MEMBER